addaScan home
Assessment
Application guide · Fill levels and closures

Yoghurt cup lid presence and alignment

By Frank GuoPublished Updated 6 min read

// The inspection task

Yoghurt-cup lid inspection must distinguish an intentionally shaped lid from a displaced lid that exposes the required sealing area. Locate the cup rim independently, then compare the membrane coverage with that reference. A pull tab outside the rim is not automatically a defect, and a centred-looking print is not proof of complete coverage.

Application guide by addaScanCompare the inspection task, imaging conditions and validation steps with your own production line.

Task
Yoghurt cup lid presence and alignment
Decision focus
Seal inspection
Workflow
Establish the cup-based reference.
Validation
Good wet and glossy lids
Application images

Locate the lid against the cup opening

Original explanatory diagrams show the product states and inspection questions. They are schematics, not captured inspection results.

Yoghurt cup lid presence and alignment: lid centred — explanatory diagram. The lid covers the expected cup opening.
Lid centred

The lid covers the expected cup opening.

Yoghurt cup lid presence and alignment: lid absent — explanatory diagram. The opening remains uncovered.
Lid absent

The opening remains uncovered.

Yoghurt cup lid presence and alignment: lid displaced — explanatory diagram. Compare the lid edge with the cup reference.
Lid displaced

Compare the lid edge with the cup reference.

Yoghurt cup lid presence and alignment: folded edge — explanatory diagram. A visible fold interrupts the intended margin.
Folded edge

A visible fold interrupts the intended margin.

Select an image to view it at full size.

Measure lid coverage against the cup rim

Explore Fill level, cap and seal inspection and Yoghurt cup inspection to connect this inspection task with the wider station requirements.

Swipe across the table to compare all columns →

Inspection decisions for yoghurt cup lid presence and alignment
DecisionEvidence to useRule to agree
Lid presentConfirm the required lid region exists.Reject an uncovered cup.
Lid alignedCompare lid position with the located cup.Do not use artwork alone as the datum.
Margin visible and acceptableAssess the agreed edge region.Hold obscured or visibly defective margins.

Use separate cup and lid contours

Define the required sealing ring from the cup geometry and map the membrane edge around it. Exclude the approved pull-tab shape from inappropriate circularity checks while still evaluating the relevant seal area. Condensation can obscure edges or create false highlights; validate whether the image contains enough evidence before measuring displacement.

A top view is useful for presence and coverage. Additional views or height information may be needed for lifted edges, depending on their visibility. Neither a complete visible overlap nor a flat-looking membrane alone proves seal integrity. Assign leak or seal-strength requirements to their corresponding tests.

Schematic concentric cup-rim and sealing-ring outlines with a highlighted membrane edge and callouts for the pull tab and exposed rim.
The cup and membrane contours are evaluated separately. The tab is an approved feature; the required sealing ring still needs membrane coverage.

On a small screen, scroll across the diagram to inspect the labels.

Swipe across the table to compare all columns →

Choose the approach from the observable task
ApproachUseful whenWhat to validate
Top viewLid coverage and lateral position are visible.Check foil glare and pull tabs.
Oblique edge viewLifted edges need another angle.Confirm neighbouring cups do not obstruct it.
Lane-specific viewsA common view loses detail or visibility.Maintain lane-to-reject correspondence.

Worked example: a wrinkle looks like an exposed rim

In an illustrative cup, the lid edge is correctly located but a reflective wrinkle crosses the sealing-ring image. Compare the local evidence with the independent cup and membrane contours. If the membrane still covers the required area and the wrinkle is permitted, it is not a displacement failure. If the actual cup rim is exposed beyond the allowed overlap, reject the cup for coverage.

If condensation prevents a reliable edge decision, hold or recheck the cup instead of returning a favourable offset. In a multi-lane machine, retain lane and cup-event identifiers through each image and reject command. A failure in one lane must not trigger the adjacent cup. After an authorised rework, inspect the identified cup again and preserve the first failed attempt.

Swipe across the table to compare all columns →

Evidence, decision and recovery for use the cup rim as the coverage reference
Observed evidenceInspection decisionAction and retained record
The approved pull tab protrudes while the required sealing ring remains covered.Tab geometry alone does not indicate misalignment.Keep independent cup and membrane contours. Evaluate any wrinkle or lifting requirement separately before issuing the final cup decision.
The actual membrane edge leaves part of the required cup-rim band exposed.Coverage failure relative to the cup datum.Record the exposed sector, lane and cup event. Confirm rejection in the correct lane and preserve the failed inspection before rework.
Condensation prevents a reliable membrane edge although the lid appears present.Presence may pass; alignment remains unmeasured.Hold or recheck the cup using the qualified recovery route. Do not substitute a lid-presence result for required coverage evidence.

How should a misplaced or uncertain lid be handled?

  1. 01Locate the cupEstablish the cup-based reference.
  2. 02Check the lidEvaluate presence and alignment.
  3. 03Inspect the marginRecord visible edge faults or incomplete coverage.
  4. 04Reject before packingKeep the decision with its cup and lane.
Inspection sequence: validate event association and exception handling on the line.

Associate each cup with its result before multipacking hides the rim. Where several lanes share a camera, preserve lane and cup identity. A partially hidden rim needs a coverage response; passing the visible half does not establish that the complete required seal margin was checked.

Challenge tabs, wrinkles and lane offsets separately

Include approved tab orientations, displaced membranes, acceptable wrinkles, condensation and cups shifted within their lane. Record both contours, coverage decision, image-validity status and actual reject confirmation.

Check that recipe changes update cup geometry and lid design together. A larger lid from a different product may hide the entire rim while still being the wrong component, so identity requirements need their own check where that mix-up is possible.

Swipe across the table to compare all columns →

Validate the sample challenges against the agreed product limits.
ChallengeWhat the trial should establish
Good wet and glossy lidsChallenge reflections and condensation.
Small shifts in different directionsTest position against the cup, not the artwork.
Missing lid and folded edgeVerify independent failure reasons.
Cup moved between lanes or stoppedConfirm the correct item is rejected.

Why lid alignment does not prove seal integrity

Use the available image to assess visible coverage and edge condition. Seal strength, microleaks, temperature history and microbiological suitability are separate process or test requirements. Product on a rim may look like a highlight, so validate with actual contamination and normal condensation rather than drawings alone.

Use Visual seal inspection vs leak testing to develop the related acceptance and integration questions for your trial.

Cup and lid variations for an alignment trial

The dairy, juice and bakery guide connects cup and lid variations with the checks needed around filling, sealing and packing.

Supply cup and lid families, accepted positioning variation, deliberately missing or shifted lids, visible folds, wet good packs and the lane/reject arrangement.

Use the optical and recovery challenges above when applying the architecture choices in HIKROBOT and other vision solutions comparison.

Scope and budget

Use the yoghurt cup inspection scope and cost factors to scope rim localisation, lid offset checks and the required reject interface.

Testing and handover

The testing and handover process should test lid glare and acceptable placement variation separately from any seal-integrity test.

// Based in Johannesburg · Serving South Africa

Assess yoghurt lid position and presence

Share the cup and lid formats, acceptable offset and examples of glare or distorted rims. Identify which seal checks are required beyond visible lid placement.